I dunno. And I was there.
Because -
Heart were able to effectively use a variety of pressing techniques, gave Brisbane little time on the ball and kept their shape very well and snuffed out any threat that Brisbane might have posed in the first half
Brisbane Roar were not focused and unable to execute their game plan
Ange was too slow in realising changes needed to be made to the personnel on the pitch
The roar did not execute the chances they created well enough
Paartalu missed an open header. He is usually good at headers
Or none of those reasons. Or all of those reasons. Or a combination of some of those and some others I hadn’t thought of …
A game is such a mishmash of little moments, combinations, mistakes and good play – how do you attribute the result to one thing?